Justia Lawyer Rating
Super Lawyers
Washtenaw County Bar Association
AVVO Clients' Choice Award 2017
MIAOWIA

People v. Nicolaides: Blood Alcohol Content v. Under The Influence

ArborYpsi Law

In the case of People v. Nicolaides, the Michigan Court of Appeals answered a long-standing question related to drunk driving trials at the time the case was decided. Although the issue is well-settled, the case is still important for drunk driving lawyers to understand when going to trial.

The Issue

The defendant was charged with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of liquor, and with operating a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol content of .10 or over. The case was in the 48th District Court in Bloomfield Hills.

The Defendant wished to force the prosecutor to choose which theory to proceed on at trial. This would make the Defendant’s life easier, because then he would only have to defend against one theory of guilty instead of two theories.

The Court’s Decision

The Court decided that the prosecution did not have to choose between going forward on just one or the other theory of guilt. The jury could find the defendant is guilty upon a finding that the defendant either had an unlawful blood alcohol content or was under the influence of alcohol.

What Does This Mean?

The case is bad for defendants who must defend themselves against charges of operating while intoxicated. This means at trial the defendant must beat two theories of guilt.

The prosecution wins if it proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant operated with a BAC of over .08 (lower now than when the case was decided). This would be per se intoxication of alcohol.

The prosecution can also win by showing that a person was under the influence of alcohol, regardless of the BAC numbers. Which means the prosecutor does not necessarily have to prove the person had a blood alcohol content of .08 or above, just that the person was under the influence, meaning the person’s ability to drive was substantially lessened by alcohol. The defendant must beat “the numbers” and the “facts.”

In addition, the jury does not need to agree on which theory to convict the defendant. The jury could be split between one theory or the other and still find the defendant guilty.

Operating While Intoxicated Attorney in Ann Arbor

Have you been charged with operating while intoxicated or another drinking and driving crime? Call us to see how we can help.

Contact Us

Call Sam Bernstein at 734-883-9584 or e-mail at bernstein@arborypsilaw.com.

Sam Bernstein is a DUI Lawyer.

ArborYpsi Law is located at 2750 Carpenter Rd #2, Ann Arbor, MI 48108.

Read More

  • Can I Get a DUI in a Self-Driving Car?
  • Can I Drink and Drive in My Driveway?
  • Can I Get a DUI for Sniffing Glue and Driving?
  • Can I Get a DUI for Smoking Medical Marijuana?

Client Reviews

Sam was a helpful lawyer who is a man of his word. He helped in our cases 2 times in a row with successful outcomes. I could not think of a better lawyer who is always on time to court, good attitude, smart, and honest. He is respectful and answers all of the questions we had. Two cases were both a...

Gigi

It has been a couple of days since Sam represented my son in Washtenaw County. He gave me the miracle I prayed for. He did way more than I thought was possible and as I told him on the phone I would hug him if I could. If you ever need a good lawyer, this guy is the one to hire – and his prices are...

Linda

Sam took my call and consulted me immediately. He provided fair pricing for the legal services I was requiring. I hired him about a week before my case, he still took on the case load and did amazing work. He is an excellent attorney and a friendly person to be in the court room with when you’re in...

Devon

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation
  2. 2 Available 24/7
  3. 3 12 Years of Experience
Fill out the contact form or call us at (734) 883-9584 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message