Close

Ann Arbor Criminal Defense Blog

Updated:

People v. Warren: Can It Be Prostitution Without Sex?

The Michigan Supreme Court in People v. Brown answered a pressing question: Is it prostitution if it was only hands? In this case, defendants owned a massage parlor where nude female employees provided manual stimulation to nude male customers. The defendants argued that this was not prostitution because the definition of…

Updated:

People v. Kowlaski: Supreme Court Answers What Does It Mean to “Accost” A Child for Immoral Purposes?

The Michigan Supreme Court Case of People v. Kowalski focuses on the law of accosting a minor for immoral purposes under MCL 750.145a. Specifically, the Court answers the question of what does it mean to ‘accost’ a minor? What Happened in the Case Defendant was speaking with a “girl” on…

Updated:

People v. Tennyson: What Does It Mean to Contribute to the Neglect or Delinquency of a Minor Child?

The Michigan Supreme Court in People v. Tennyson discusses the Michigan law of contributing the delinquency of a minor. In this case, the Court sought to determine whether evidence that a child was present in a home where a defendant was in possession of drugs and firearms is legally sufficient…

Updated:

People v. Roger: Courts OKs Prosecutions for Drunk Snowmobile Driving Under Motor Vehicle Code

The Michigan Supreme Court in People v. Roger held that a person can be prosecuted under the motor vehicle code drunk driving statute for operating a snowmobile while intoxicated on the road. The Case Facts The facts of the case aren’t complicated. Defendant Roger was riding a snowmobile down the…

Updated:

People v. Favreau: Man in His Hotel Room Cannot Be Convicted of Disorderly Person-Public Intoxication

The Court of Appeals in People v. Favreau ruled that Defendant’s conviction for disorderly person was improper because a hotel room is not a public place. The disorderly person public intoxication statute requires a person to be intoxicated in a public place for a conviction. The Case Facts Defendant was…

Updated:

People v. Reynolds: What Does it Mean to Carry a Concealed Weapon?

The Michigan Court of Appeals in People v. Reynolds discusses what it means to have a “concealed weapon.” Reynolds was charged with Carrying a Concealed Weapon under Michigan Law MCL 750.227. After a jury trial convicted him of that crime, he appealed. The Court of Appeals analyzed the elements and…

Updated:

People v. Stevens: The Inoperable Gun Defense to Felonious Assault Charges

The short but important Michigan Supreme Court decision in People v. Stevens holds that an inoperable gun cannot be the basis of a felonious assault conviction. What Happened in the Case The Defendant Stevens pointed a starter pistol at another person. He was charged with felonious assault under MCL 705.82.…

Contact Us