Under federal law, crimes of violence are punished more harshly than other offenses. While the definition of a crime of violence is established by statute, disputes nonetheless continue regarding whether certain offenses fall under the definition. In a recent ruling, a Michigan court discussed what constitutes a crime of violence…
Ann Arbor Criminal Defense Blog
Michigan Court Explains Burdens of Proof in Criminal Matters
Certain crimes include an element of intent. As such, if the prosecution is unable to demonstrate that the defendant possessed the state of mind needed to commit the crime, it should not be able to obtain a conviction. Recently, a Michigan court discussed burdens of proof with regard to intent…
Michigan Court Discusses Evidence of Other Acts in Criminal Trials
Typically, in Michigan criminal trials, the prosecution is not permitted to introduce evidence that the defendant previously engaged in wrongful behavior that is similar to the criminal offense they are accused of committing. There are some exceptions, though, as demonstrated in a recent Michigan matter in which the defendant challenged…
Michigan Court Discusses Joint Trials in Criminal Matters
Typically, criminal defendants are tried individually. The state is not precluded from trying numerous criminal defendants at one time, however. For example, if multiple people were allegedly engaged in the same course of criminal conduct, the prosecution may seek a joint trial. In a recent Michigan ruling, the court addressed…
Michigan Court Explains When the Stay of a Habeas Corpus Petition is Appropriate
Just because a person is convicted of a crime does not mean that they no longer have any recourse. Instead, there are often numerous avenues a party can explore in search of a favorable outcome. For example, a person who believes they are being unlawfully detained in prison can file…
Michigan Court Discusses the Right to Self-Representation in Criminal Matters
Under both the Michigan and United States Constitutions, criminal defendants have the right to represent themselves at trial. Exercising the right of self-representation is not as simple as a criminal defendant merely stating that they would prefer to proceed without an attorney, however. Instead, the court must establish the requirements…
Michigan Court Discusses Unlawful Searches and Seizures
The United States and Michigan Constitutions grant people certain privacy rights. This means, among other things, that they are protected from unreasonable searches. In other words, the police generally cannot search someone unless they have a reasonable suspicion that the person is engaging in criminal activity. If they conduct a…
Michigan Court Discusses Inconsistent Verdicts in Criminal Matters
It is well established under Michigan law that people can be charged with more than one offense following a single criminal incident. They cannot be found guilty twice for the same crime, however, as such rulings violate double jeopardy. Further, they cannot be found guilty of multiple crimes if such…
Michigan Court Denies Criminal Defendant’s Motion for Compassionate Release
The COVID-19 pandemic impacted people in many facets of society, including those serving time in prison. Many inmates were able to obtain compassionate release during the pandemic, pursuant to the First Step Act. Since the introduction of vaccines, though, it has become more difficult to demonstrate such relief is warranted,…
Michigan Court Discusses the Standard of Review in Criminal Appeals
In Michigan criminal matters, the prosecution bears the burden of proving each element of a charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt. If it cannot meet this burden, the evidence should be deemed insufficient to obtain or sustain a conviction. The standard of review the court employs when faced with challenges…